From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beck v. Scimeca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The proof submitted on the motion for summary judgment demonstrated that the plaintiff Robert Beck voluntarily assumed the risk of the martial arts activity in which he was participating (see, e.g., Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432; Chimerine v. World Champion John Chung Tae Kwon Do Inst., 225 A.D.2d 323; Rubenstein v. Woodstock Riding Club, 208 A.D.2d 1160; Cardoza v. Village of Freeport, 205 A.D.2d 571). Therefore, based on the circumstances of this case, summary judgment was properly granted. Rosenblatt, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beck v. Scimeca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Beck v. Scimeca

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BECK et al., Appellants, v. LENNY SCIMECA, Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 283

Citing Cases

Morgan v. State

Morgan v. State of New York, 229 A.D.2d 737, affirmed. Beck v. Scimeca, 229 A.D.2d 555, affirmed. Chimerine…

Vendura v. Fasano

Specifically, while executing a knife-disarming maneuver, the defendant, also a fourth-degree black belt,…