From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BECK v. PAWLENTY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civil File No. 04-686 (MJD/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civil File No. 04-686 (MJD/JJG).

August 29, 2006

Reverend Beck, Ph.D., Pro Se.

Mark B. Levinger, Assistant Minnesota Attorney General, Counsel for Defendants.


ORDER


I. INTRODUCTION

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court pursuant to an objection to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham, dated July 18, 2006. Petitioner Beck filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation dated June 18, 2006.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2006 [Docket No. 117] is hereby ADOPTED.


Summaries of

BECK v. PAWLENTY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civil File No. 04-686 (MJD/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

BECK v. PAWLENTY

Case Details

Full title:REVEREND BECK, Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. TIM PAWLENTY, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

Civil File No. 04-686 (MJD/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Reese v. Sherburne Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Instead the prisoner must show that this conduct actually prevented the prisoner from litigating the claim.”…

Laughlin v. Stuart

Instead the prisoner must show that this conduct actually prevented the prisoner from litigating the claim.”…