From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beck v. General Neon Tube Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1937
253 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

December 30, 1937.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.


While riding a bicycle on a public highway, the infant plaintiff, then twelve years old, was struck and run over by an automobile owned by the corporate defendant and operated by the other defendant, its employee. Through his guardian ad litem he brought an action, which came to trial five and one-half years after the accident. His father brought a separate action to recover for medical expenses and loss of services, and the actions were consolidated. The jury found for defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the infant plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The error in the court's charge (fols. 326, 327), and in its refusal to charge as requested by the plaintiffs (fol. 332), are, therefore, not material. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.)


Summaries of

Beck v. General Neon Tube Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1937
253 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Beck v. General Neon Tube Corp.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER BECK, by His Guardian ad Litem, LOUIS BECK, and LOUIS BECK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1937

Citations

253 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)