From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beck v. City of Plainwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-735 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-735

11-19-2012

BARBARA L. BECK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLAINWELL, et al., Defendants.


HON. JANET T. NEFF


ORDER

This is a civil action brought by a pro se litigant. On October 30, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt 142), recommending that Defendant's Erik J. Wilson, William Bomar, John Varley and Rickey L. Updike's Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt 130) be granted. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 142) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Erik J. Wilson, William Bomar, John Varley and Rickey L. Updike's Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt 130) is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Only the allegations of retaliation against Defendant Bomar, asserted in paragraphs ##102-04 of Plaintiff's complaint, and the allegations of retaliation against Defendant Varley, asserted in paragraph #86, remain.

_____________

JANET T. NEFF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Beck v. City of Plainwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-735 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Beck v. City of Plainwell

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA L. BECK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLAINWELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-735 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)