Opinion
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00623-RPM
03-18-2013
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION TO ARBITRATE
On March 15, 2013, the defendant filed a Motion and Demand for Arbitration Pursuant to Residency Agreement. The defendants also filed their answer on that date. The demand for arbitration may have some merit with respect to the breach of contract claim, it is not going to preclude litigation of the first two claims for relief and it is therefore
ORDERED ruling on the demand for arbitration will be deferred to be discussed at the scheduling conference to be set.
BY THE COURT:
________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge