Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Co. v. Clackamas Cty

Full title: BEAVER CREEK COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY, an Oregon corporation…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Civil Case No. 07-645-ST (D. Or. Dec. 17, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 07-645-ST.

December 17, 2007

Jeremy D. Sacks, Amy Edwards, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, Timothy J. O'Connell, Stoel Rives, LLP, Seattle, Washington, Richard A. Finnigan, Olympia, Washington, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Pamela J. Beery, Matthew James Michel, Beery Elsner Hammond, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendant.

ORDER

GARR KING, District Judge

The Honorable Janice Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on November 21, 2007. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#44). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement (# 8) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as set forth in the Findings and Recommendation.