Opinion
21-cv-3574 (VSB)
08-16-2021
BEAUREGARDE HOLDINGS LLP et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE PROVINCE OF LA RIOJA, Defendant.
ORDER
VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I am in receipt of the Moving Plaintiffs' reply memorandum of law in support of their motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 29.) In this reply memorandum, the Moving Plaintiffs now represent that they take Defendant's position on method-of-damages calculations, and thus argue that “the only disputed factual issues raised by Defendant's opposition to the motion for summary judgment have been addressed and resolved.” (Id. at 3-4.) In light of this, and the recent declarations of Martin Mojzis, (Docs. 28, 30), it is hereby:
ORDERED that Defendant is directed to submit a sur-reply of no more than seven (7) pages on or before August 20, 2021, indicating (1) whether, in light of Moving Plaintiffs' reply brief and the declarations from Martin Mojzis, Defendant believes that there are any genuine issues of material fact at issue with regard to the Moving Plaintiffs' application, and (2) whether or not Defendant objects to the proposed order submitted by the Moving Plaintiffs at Document 32.
SO ORDERED.