Opinion
May 13, 1960
Order granting motion for intervention unanimously affirmed, without costs. While it is dubious that the intervenor has any interest in the property which would survive the lis pendens, nevertheless in view of its argument of collusion it should, in the exercise of discretion, be permitted to intervene.
Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.