From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beaudette v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01978-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01978-AP

10-15-2012

KELLY A. BEAUDETTE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff: ROBERT K. GRUBER Attorney at Law For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH, United States Attorney District of Colorado J. BENEDICT GARCIA, Assistant United States Attorney DANIEL E. BURROWS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration, Region VIII


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: ROBERT K. GRUBER
Attorney at Law
For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH,
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
J. BENEDICT GARCIA,
Assistant United States Attorney
DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 30, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 8, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 2, 2012 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The Administrative record appears to be complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case. 7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: November 26, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: December 26, 2012

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: January 10, 2013 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement:

Plaintiff does not request oral argument

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: For Plaintiff: _____________
ROBERT K. GRUBER
Attorney at Law
For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH,
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
J. BENEDICT GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
_____________
DANIEL E. BURROWS,
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration,
Region VIII


Summaries of

Beaudette v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01978-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Beaudette v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KELLY A. BEAUDETTE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01978-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)