From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beaty v. Daniels

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 9, 2006
Case No. 06-290-AS (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 06-290-AS.

August 9, 2006

Mickey Beaty, Oregon, Pro Se Petitioner.

Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, Pro Se Petitioner.

Scott Erik Asphaug, Assistant United States Attorney, Oregon, Attorneys for Respondent.


ORDER


The Honorable Donald C. Ashmanskas, United States Magistrate Judge, filed his Findings and Recommendation (#19) on July 10, 2006, and referred it to me on August 7, 2006. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); see also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas's Findings and Recommendation (#19).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss (#11) is GRANTED and Petitioner Beaty's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (#1) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Beaty v. Daniels

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 9, 2006
Case No. 06-290-AS (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Beaty v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:MICKEY BEATY, Petitioner, v. CHARLES DANIELS and NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

Case No. 06-290-AS (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2006)