From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BEATTY v. MIAH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2011
83 A.D.3d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4924.

April 28, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered March 16, 2010, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, in this action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, granted the motion of defendants Mo Azher Miah and West Cab Corp., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Weiss Rosenbloom, P.C., New York (Barry D. Weiss of counsel), for appellant.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Gonzalez, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


Defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants submitted, inter alia, the affirmed reports of a neurologist, a radiologist and an orthopedist, who, based upon examinations of plaintiff and his medical records, all concluded that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Plaintiffs MRI scan, which evidenced a bulging disc, was taken nearly four years after the accident, and was too remote to be probative of his accident-related claim, especially since neither the radiologist nor plaintiffs doctor who treated him in 2008 offered any nonspeculative opinion as to a causal connection between the bulging disc and the accident ( see Pou v E S Wholesale Meats, Inc., 68 AD3d 446; Whisenant v Farazi, 67 AD3d 535).

Plaintiffs claim based on an alleged inability to engage in substantially all of his daily activities for 90 of the first 180 days post-accident was refuted by his own testimony. Plaintiff testified that he missed only one day of work and was only confined to bed after work ( see Pou at 447).


Summaries of

BEATTY v. MIAH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2011
83 A.D.3d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

BEATTY v. MIAH

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BEATTY, Appellant, v. Mo AZHBR MIAH et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3343
922 N.Y.S.2d 323

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Graham

The plaintiff failed to meet his shifting burden as his affidavit was conclusory and failed to establish a…

Khan v. Goldmag Hacking Corp.

(compare Williams v. Tatham, 92 A.D.3d 472, 473, 938 N.Y.S.2d 75 [1st Dept.2012] [the plaintiff created an…