Opinion
No. 89-195
Opinion delivered July 17, 1989
APPEAL ERROR — APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE IT DID NOT INVOLVE AN APPEALABLE ORDER, THE RECORD WAS INSUFFICIENT, AND IT APPEARED THAT THE PARTIES WERE ASKING FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION. — Where the appeal was not shown to involve an appealable order, the record was insufficient, and it appeared that the parties were asking for an advisory opinion, the appeal was dismissed without prejudice to proceed further in the trial court.
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court, Second Division; John C. Earl, Chancellor; appeal dismissed.
David L. Beatty and Wayne Wagner, pro se.
Ralph P. Forbes, on behalf of himself and appellants the People, Citizens, Voters, and Tax Payers of Arkansas.
Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Jeffery A. Bell, Deputy Att'y Gen., and Paul L. Cherry, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellees Clinton, Fisher, Pledger, and Moody.
Joseph K. Mahoney II, Michael K. Wilson, and Art A. Givens, pro se.
This appeal is dismissed because it is not shown to involve an appealable order, the record is insufficient, and it appears that the parties are asking us for an advisory opinion.
The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to proceed further in the trial court.
NEWBERN, J., not participating.