From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beason v. Brock and Blevins, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 24, 1974
494 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-3803. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y. et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

May 24, 1974.

Charles E. Sharp, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

George C. Longshore, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.



We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in permitting counsel for plaintiff to make a "unit of time" argument in the final portion of his closing argument. All of the protective features required by Baron Tube Co. v. Transport Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F.2d 858 (en banc), were employed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Beason v. Brock and Blevins, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 24, 1974
494 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1974)
Case details for

Beason v. Brock and Blevins, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. BEASON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BROCK AND BLEVINS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 24, 1974

Citations

494 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1974)

Citing Cases

Lanham v. Whitfield

See, Warren v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 693 F.2d 1373 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Beason v. Brock and…