From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beason v. Belleque

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Dec 11, 2011
Civil No. 09-1346-TC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1346-TC

12-11-2011

ROGER LYNN BEASON, JR., Petitioner, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, Respondent.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 3, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ, P, 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. Petitioner's petition (#2) is denied. This proceeding is dismissed. ' The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

___________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Beason v. Belleque

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Dec 11, 2011
Civil No. 09-1346-TC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Beason v. Belleque

Case Details

Full title:ROGER LYNN BEASON, JR., Petitioner, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE

Date published: Dec 11, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 09-1346-TC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2011)