From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beardsley v. Johnson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 24, 1923
64 Cal.App. 507 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)

Opinion

Civ. No. 4130.

November 24, 1923.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Russ Avery, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Haas Dunnigan and F. W. Nightingill for Appellants.

John Beardsley, in pro. per., for Respondents.


[1] There being no appearance on the part of appellants and no points and authorities being filed in their behalf, the appeal is dismissed.

It further appearing to this court, after examination of the record herein, that there is no merit in this appeal and that the same is frivolous, it is hereby ordered that respondents recover of appellants as damages the sum of one hundred dollars.

Conrey, P. J., and Houser, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Beardsley v. Johnson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 24, 1923
64 Cal.App. 507 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
Case details for

Beardsley v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BEARDSLEY, Respondent, v. F. O. JOHNSON et al., Appellants. CHARLES…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Nov 24, 1923

Citations

64 Cal.App. 507 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
222 P.2d 165