In Marin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 374 S.W.2d 227, the verdict forms were not made a part of the record on appeal. The trial court stated in the charge that suitable forms for their verdict were attached. This Court held the burden was on the defendant to show that all of the forms for possible verdicts were not available to the jury. In Beard v. State, 41 Tex.Crim. R., 53 S.W. 348, a charge in a murder trial that if the jury found the accused guilty they would assess his punishment at years, and if they found him not guilty they would simply say so in their verdict, was held not objectionable as giving no alternative form in case of acquittal and thus leaving the jury without option to convict. The district attorney in his brief states that the not guilty form of verdict is not as complete as those normally employed, but if the foreman had signed the "not guilty' form provided, the conclusion would have been inescapable that the jury found him not guilty.

Leslie v. State, 49 S.W. Rep., 73; Morgan v. State, 31 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Beard v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. 173; Whitfield v. State, 40 Tex.Crim. Rep.; White v. State, 40 Tex.Crim.