holding that the plaintiff and his comparator were not similarly situated where the plaintiff had much more experience than the comparator
Summary of this case from Collins v. Okefenoke Rural Elec. Membership Corp.No. 06-12220.
December 11, 2006.
Appeal from the N.D.Ala., 206 Fed.Appx. 852.
Denial of Rehearing En Banc.
holding that the plaintiff and his comparator were not similarly situated where the plaintiff had much more experience than the comparator
Summary of this case from Collins v. Okefenoke Rural Elec. Membership Corp.holding that the plaintiff and his comparator were not similarly situated where the plaintiff had much more experience than the comparator
Summary of this case from Carreker v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'nfinding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Hudson v. Bibb Cnty. Props., LLCfinding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Williams v. Bibb Cnty. Props., LLCfinding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Pritchett v. Bibb Cnty. Props., LLCfinding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Reed v. Austal, U.S.A. L.L.C.finding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Roberson v. Austal, U.S.A. L.L.C.finding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Hollis v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.finding the plaintiff and a proposed comparator had different numbers of years of experiences such that they were not similarly situated in all relevant respects
Summary of this case from Matthews v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.Full title:Laura Beard v. 84 Lumber Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Date published: Dec 11, 2006
"A subjective reason for the employer's action can be as legitimate as any other reason, and an employee…
Williams v. Bibb Cnty. Props., LLCWilson, 376 F.3d at 1091.See also e.g., Head v. Pitts Enterp , Inc., 2010 WL 2773376, *13 (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14,…