From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bear v. Underwood

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 10, 2016
379 P.3d 955 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92164–4

02-10-2016

Michael Chiofar Gummo Bear, Petitioner, v. Michael Underwood, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 9, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 13 That the Petition for Review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Bear v. Underwood

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 10, 2016
379 P.3d 955 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

Bear v. Underwood

Case Details

Full title:Michael Chiofar Gummo Bear, Petitioner, v. Michael Underwood, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

379 P.3d 955 (Wash. 2016)
184 Wash. 2d 1034
184 Wn. 2d 1034