From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bear Creek Techs., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2017
2016-1805 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1805

03-15-2017

BEAR CREEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

ANTHONY L. MIELE, Miele Law Group, Medway, MA, argued for appellant. DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, THOMAS W. KELTON; GREGORY P. HUH, Richardson, TX.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,190.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY L. MIELE, Miele Law Group, Medway, MA, argued for appellant. DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, THOMAS W. KELTON; GREGORY P. HUH, Richardson, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 15, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Bear Creek Techs., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2017
2016-1805 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Bear Creek Techs., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BEAR CREEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2017

Citations

2016-1805 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2017)