From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beamon v. Parkland Hospital

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 20, 2008
NO. 3:08-CV-0693-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 3:08-CV-0693-D.

August 20, 2008


ORDER


After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

Accordingly, plaintiff is allowed to prosecute his medical care claim against Dr. Arlene Peay. Plaintiff's claims against Parkland Hospital are summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Beamon v. Parkland Hospital

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 20, 2008
NO. 3:08-CV-0693-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Beamon v. Parkland Hospital

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL M. BEAMON, JR. Plaintiff, VS. PARKLAND HOSPITAL, ET AL. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

NO. 3:08-CV-0693-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Parkland Health & Hosp. Sys.

(Doc. 8 at Answer 3). Even assuming Plaintiff could allege sufficient facts establishing a constitutional…

Webb v. Jones

Parkland Hospital is considered a state actor for purposes of § 1983, but Webb's claims against it fail for…