From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beamgard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 20, 2022
656 S.W.3d 23 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 85039

12-20-2022

Ryan M. BEAMGARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jeannie Marie Willibey, Kansas City, MO for Appellant. Kristen Shively Johnson, Jefferson City, MO for Respondent.


Jeannie Marie Willibey, Kansas City, MO for Appellant.

Kristen Shively Johnson, Jefferson City, MO for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ryan Beamgard appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing, after Beamgard pled guilty to six offenses. Beamgard contends the circuit court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, arguing the record leaves a definite and firm impression that the plea court violated Rule 24.02 and Beamgard's constitutional rights by failing to inform Beamgard that the maximum penalty included the possibility of consecutive sentences, rendering Beamgard's guilty plea unknowing and involuntary. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Beamgard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 20, 2022
656 S.W.3d 23 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Beamgard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan M. BEAMGARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

656 S.W.3d 23 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)