From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beall v. Bruce Thornton Air Conditioning, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 28, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00941-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00941-B

07-28-2015

TYSON BEALL, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE THORNTON AIR CONDITIONING, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Bruce Thornton Air Conditioning, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Lubbock Division of the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (the "Motion"). Doc. 8. Having considered the Motion and the filings in this case, the Court finds that Defendant did not sufficiently meet its burden of showing that the private and public interest factors weigh in favor of transfer. Gulf Oil Corp v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508, 67 S.Ct. 839, 843 (1947); In re Volkswagen AG, 371 F.3d 201, 203 (5th Cir. 2004). In particular, Defendant failed to (1) "specifically identify the key witnesses and outline the substance of their testimony[,]" N2 Consulting, LLC v. Engineered Fastener Co., 2002 WL 31246770, at *3 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2002) (internal citations omitted), (2) supply the Court with any information regarding the potential court congestion of the Dallas Division compared to the Lubbock Division, and (3) demonstrate the local interest in having the case decided in the Lubbock Division. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion.

However, in light of the fact that the alleged incident underlying Plaintiff's action—i.e., Plaintiff's termination from his employment due to an injury he sustained while participating in a training exercise for his Marine Corps reserve unit—occurred in Lubbock County, Plaintiff is a resident of Lubbock, and Defendant's principal place of business is in Lubbock, the Court believes that transfer may be warranted in this case. Doc. 1, Complaint ¶¶ 2, 4, 9-14. Therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant leave to file an amended motion addressing the deficiencies highlighted by the Court above. Should Defendant elect to file an amended motion, it must do so by no later than August 11, 2015.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED: July 28, 2015.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Beall v. Bruce Thornton Air Conditioning, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 28, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00941-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Beall v. Bruce Thornton Air Conditioning, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TYSON BEALL, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE THORNTON AIR CONDITIONING, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00941-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

Lupton v. Express Co.

1 Chamb. Mod. Ev., vol. 1, sec. 729. "The process of X-Ray photography is now as well established as a…

Young v. Gregory Bus Line

The trial judge having received his ruling on the question as to whether the plaintiff was a witness for the…