From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beall v. Beall-Siegman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nov 18, 2013
Civil No. 13-cv-457-PB (D.N.H. Nov. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 13-cv-457-PB

11-18-2013

Mickey W. Beall v. Amy D. Beall-Siegman


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated October 25, 2013. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge
cc: Mickey W. Beall, Pro Se


Summaries of

Beall v. Beall-Siegman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nov 18, 2013
Civil No. 13-cv-457-PB (D.N.H. Nov. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Beall v. Beall-Siegman

Case Details

Full title:Mickey W. Beall v. Amy D. Beall-Siegman

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Nov 18, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 13-cv-457-PB (D.N.H. Nov. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

McInnis v. McInnis

The DPPA, however, does not provide Ms. McInnis with a private cause of action. See Beall v. Beall-Siegman,…