From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beal-Medea Prods., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Dec 19, 2017
92 N.Y.S.3d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2015–273 K C

12-19-2017

BEAL–MEDEA PRODUCTS, INC., as Assignee of Alexander Atiba, Appellant, v. ELRAC, INC., Doing Business as Enterprise Rent–A–Car, Respondent.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Daniel Grace, Esq.), for appellant. Brand, Glick & Brand, for respondent (no brief filed).


Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Daniel Grace, Esq.), for appellant.

Brand, Glick & Brand, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it had never received the claim at issue, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.

Contrary to plaintiff's argument, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it had mailed the claim at issue (see Zuckerman v. City of New York , 49 NY2d 557 [1980] ). Plaintiff's remaining contention is improperly raised for the first time on appeal and, in any event, lacks merit.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beal-Medea Prods., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Dec 19, 2017
92 N.Y.S.3d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Beal-Medea Prods., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BEAL–MEDEA PRODUCTS, INC., as Assignee of Alexander Atiba, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Date published: Dec 19, 2017

Citations

92 N.Y.S.3d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
58 Misc. 3d 134