From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beacham v. Cohen, Schwartz & Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
2:12-cv-01110-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-01110-GEB-CKD

07-30-2012

GLEDEL BEACHAM, Plaintiff, v. COHEN, SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL

SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

The April 26, 2012 Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled a status conference in this case on August 6, 2012, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference. The April 26, 2012 Order further required that a status report be filed regardless of whether a joint report could be procured. No status report was filed as ordered.

Therefore, Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause ("OSC") in a writing to be filed no later than August 6, 2012, why sanctions should not be imposed against her and/or her counsel under Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file a timely status report. The written response shall also state whether Plaintiff or her counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on September 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date and time. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.

"If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged." Matter of Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Beacham v. Cohen, Schwartz & Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
2:12-cv-01110-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Beacham v. Cohen, Schwartz & Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:GLEDEL BEACHAM, Plaintiff, v. COHEN, SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES; and DOES 1-10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-01110-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)