From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beach Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 22, 1993
10 F.3d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-1089.

Decided October 22, 1993. Publication Ordered December 21, 1993.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission.

Deborah C. Costlow and Thomas C. Power, Washington, DC, were on the brief for petitioners.

John E. Ingle, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, F.C.C., Renee Licht, Acting Gen. Counsel, F.C.C., Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Douglas N. Letter and Bruce G. Forrest, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the brief for respondents.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, EDWARDS and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.


ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT


Upon motion by respondents pursuant to Local Rule 14(e), the Court directs that the order herein, issued by the Court on October 22, 1993, be published. The order reads as follows:

ORDER

This cause came before the court upon petition for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission and is presently on remand from the Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2096, 124 L.Ed.2d 211. Upon consideration of the supplemental briefs of the parties filed pursuant to the order of July 29, 1993, it is

Ordered, by the Court, that the petition for review is dismissed. We find that there is no basis for application of a heightened scrutiny standard as claimed by petitioners and, therefore, there is no remaining meritorious issue to be considered.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.


Summaries of

Beach Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 22, 1993
10 F.3d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
Case details for

Beach Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C

Case Details

Full title:BEACH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MAXTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PACIFIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 1993

Citations

10 F.3d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

Liberty Cable Co., Inc. v. City of N.Y.

However, a SMATV system that uses cable to link more than one multiple unit dwelling not under common…

Bershatsky v. Levin

Def's Mem. at 4. Therefore, according to defendant, Judiciary Law § 506 is entitled to receive minimal…