Opinion
No. 66413
02-10-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND AND DISMISSING APPEAL
The parties have filed a motion to remand this matter to the district court pursuant to Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79, 575 P.2d 585 (1978); see also Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. 49, 228 P.3d 453 (2010). The motion is accompanied by an order of the district court certifying that upon remand it will "vacate its [prior order] and would enter an order denying Nationstar's motion for summary judgment and vacating BDJ's countermotion for summary judgment, and thereby allow litigation to continue consistent with the holdings in the Nevada Supreme Court's SFR Investments opinion."
Cause appearing, we grant the motion. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the district court pursuant to its certification, and we order this appeal dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion to reinstate this appeal should the district court decline to grant the relief requested. Any such motion to reinstate this appeal shall be filed within 60 days of the district court's order declining to grant the requested relief.
We note that any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order entered at the completion of the district court proceedings. See NRAP 3A.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk