From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.D. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
21-cv-04493-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04493-JCS

09-21-2021

B.D., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Re: Dkt. No. 13

JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Defendant's motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant shall file her answer and the administrative record no later than November 19, 2021.

The parties are reminded that under this Court's local rules, unopposed requests for extension of time should be filed as stipulations rather than motions. See Civ. L.R. 6-3(a)(2) (providing that a motion to extend time must address “the efforts the party has made to obtain a stipulation to the time change”); see generally Civ. L.R. 6-2 (addressing stipulations to extend time). Defendant is also admonished that where, as here, the circumstances requiring an extension are foreseeable, any motion to extend time should be filed well in advance of the deadline at issue, leaving at the very least the four days allowed for a response under Civil Local Rule 6-3(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

B.D. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
21-cv-04493-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

B.D. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:B.D., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04493-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)