Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-15347
03-14-2012
B.D., et. al., Plaintiffs, v. OLGA DAZZO, et al., Defendants.
DISTRICT JUDGE PATRICK J. DUGGAN
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
(DKT. NOS. 27 AND 34) AND REQUIRING ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
This matter is before the Court on the Pine Rest Defendants' motion for a more definite statement in lieu of answering Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 27). Several other defendants concur in the relief sought by the Pine Rest Defendants (Dkt. No. 34). Plaintiff filed an untimely response to the motion, which the Court in its discretion has considered. Being otherwise fully advised following oral argument on the motion and for the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED that the Pine Rest Defendants' motion and the concurrence thereto are DENIED. The Pine Rest Defendants and those defendants that concurred in their motion shall file an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 28, 2012.
____________________________
MARK A. RANDON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, March 14, 2012, electronically and by first class mail.
Melody R. Miles
Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon