Opinion
2:22-cv-00565-JCM-NJK
12-02-2022
ORDER [DOCKET NO. 22]
Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff s motion to compel compliance. Docket No. 22. No response has been filed and the time do so has now passed. See Docket.
Plaintiffs motion asks the Court to compel non-parties Sentinel 1, LLC and Sentinel 2, LLC (“Sentinel Entities”) to comply with Plaintiffs subpoenas deuces tecum, which seek documents relating to: (1) the sale of the Sentinel Entities' businesses to Defendants; (2) employees who were employed by the Sentinel Entities; and (3) the Sentinel Entities' contribution history to Plaintiffs trust fund. Id. at 2-4. The motion also asks the Coin! to order the Sentinel Entities to comply with Plaintiff s deposition subpoenas. Id.
Failure to respond to a motion constitutes consent to the granting of the motion. Local Rule 7-2(d). Accordingly, Plaintiff s motion to compel compliance is GRANTED.Docket No. 22. Sentinel 1, LLC and Sentinel 2, LLC are ORDERED to respond to Plaintiffs subpoenas deuces tecum and to make available a deponent to respond to Plaintiff s deposition subpoenas by January 3, 2023.
Plaintiffs motion also seeks sanctions against Sentinel 1, LLC and Sentinel 2, LLC for failing to comply with the subpoenas. Docket No. 22 at 6-7. A separate document must be filed for each type of relief requested. Local Rule IC 2-2(b). Accordingly, the Court declines to reach Plaintiff s request for sanctions at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.