From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Managers of the Legacy Condo. v. Core Mgmt. NY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 2, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

160149/17 160136/17 11334N 160142/17 11333 11332

04-02-2020

In re The Board of Managers of the Legacy Condominium, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Core Management NY, LLC, Respondent-Appellant. In re The Board of Managers of the Lux Condominium, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Core Management NY, LLC, Respondent-Appellant. In re The Board of Managers of the Union Square Condominium, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Core Management, NY, LLC,Respondent-Appellant.

Moses & Singer LLP, New York (Robert B. McFarlane of counsel), for appellant. Lueker Mott Zezula LLC, New York (Nathan C. Zezula of counsel), for respondents.


Moses & Singer LLP, New York (Robert B. McFarlane of counsel), for appellant.

Lueker Mott Zezula LLC, New York (Nathan C. Zezula of counsel), for respondents.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered April 22, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioners' motions for sanctions against respondent to the extent of awarding petitioners costs in the form of reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the proceedings and reasonable attorneys' fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court providently exercised its discretion in imposing monetary sanctions on respondent and detailed the reasons for doing so (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1; 22 NYCRR 130-1.2; Saleh v Hochberg, 5 AD3d 234 [1st Dept 2004]). The record shows that respondent, inter alia, refused to turn over petitioners' files after it had been terminated as petitioners' managing agent thereby causing petitioners to commence the instant proceedings. Respondent then delayed turning over the sought material, subsequently provided the material in an unusuable and disorganized format, and ignored a court order. Under the totality of the circumstances, the court's conclusion that respondent engaged in frivolous conduct during the course of the

proceedings was amply supported (see e.g. Braverman v Braverman, 146 AD3d 704 [1st Dept 2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 2, 2020

CLERK


Summaries of

Bd. of Managers of the Legacy Condo. v. Core Mgmt. NY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 2, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Bd. of Managers of the Legacy Condo. v. Core Mgmt. NY

Case Details

Full title:In re The Board of Managers of the Legacy Condominium…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Citing Cases

Mahne v. Cell Source, Inc.

Rather, the court may take into account conduct over the course of the litigation. See Board of Managers of…

Ames Assocs. v. Knapp

Rather, the court may take into account conduct over the course of the litigation. See Board of Managers of…