From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Managers of Cent. Park Place Condo. v. Potoschnig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

136 118205/09

02-04-2016

Board of Managers of Central Park Place Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Hubert Potoschnig, etc., Defendant-Appellant, American Express Centurion B, et al., Defendants.

Hubert Potoschnig, appellant pro se. Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP, New York (Maria I. Beltrani of counsel), for respondent.


Hubert Potoschnig, appellant pro se.

Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP, New York (Maria I. Beltrani of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Rakower, J.), entered November 3, 2014, which confirmed the special referee's recommendation to award plaintiff $89,174.48 in unpaid common charges, interest, assessments, electricity and late fees, and $144,377,68 in attorneys' fees, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the award of attorneys' fees, and remand the matter for a new hearing and determination of the amount of plaintiff's reasonable attorneys' fees, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The referee's recommendation of $89,174.48 in unpaid common charges, interest, assessments, electricity and late fees is supported by the record (see Domingez v Zinnar, 130 AD3d 414, 415 [1st Dept 2015]).

However, there is no evidence in the record that the referee considered the relevant factors in determining reasonable attorneys' fees (see Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]; 1050 Tenants Corp. v Lapidus, 52 AD3d 248 [1st Dept 2008]), and since the hearing evidence is not, on its face, sufficient to show the reasonable amount of attorneys' fees incurred by plaintiff, the referee's recommendation as to attorneys' fees should have been rejected (see e.g. 135 E. 57th St., LLC v 57th St. Day Spa, LLC, 126 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2015]). Accordingly we remand for a new hearing and determination of the amount of plaintiff's reasonable attorneys' fees.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 4, 2016

CLERK


Summaries of

Bd. of Managers of Cent. Park Place Condo. v. Potoschnig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Bd. of Managers of Cent. Park Place Condo. v. Potoschnig

Case Details

Full title:Board of Managers of Central Park Place Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 4, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 769
23 N.Y.S.3d 888

Citing Cases

Sina Drug Corp. v. Mohyuddin

It is well settled that "the fixation of lawyers' fees [is] to be determined on the following factors: time…

Nexbank, SSB v. Soffer

The usual factors shall be considered as part of a holistic reasonableness analysis. See In re Freeman's…