From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Educ. v. Bloomfield Ed. Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 8, 1991
598 A.2d 517 (N.J. 1991)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1991 —

Decided October 8, 1991.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Nathanya G. Simon argued the cause for appellant ( Schwartz, Pisano, Simon Edelstein, attorneys).

Kenneth I. Nowak argued the cause for respondent ( Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella Nowak, attorneys).

Donna M. Kaye argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association ( Michael F. Kaelber, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 251 N.J. Super. 379, 598 A.2d 518 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Clifford, Handler, Pollock, O'Hern, Garibaldi, and Stein. — 7

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Bd. of Educ. v. Bloomfield Ed. Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 8, 1991
598 A.2d 517 (N.J. 1991)
Case details for

Bd. of Educ. v. Bloomfield Ed. Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 8, 1991

Citations

598 A.2d 517 (N.J. 1991)
598 A.2d 517

Citing Cases

Patterson v. Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.

We exercise plenary review of the trial court's decision regarding the existence and applicability of an…

Meyers v. Hoboken Board of Education

It is clear that the CBA contains a grievance procedure and that such a procedure must be utilized. See…