From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.C.C.M.C.A. v. U.H.D. L.R.C.A

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 22, 1949
88 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 1949)

Opinion

No. 31784

Decided June 22, 1949.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Real property — Action by Montgomery County Commissioners to quiet title to courthouse site — To enable sale of such property to build new courthouse — Taxpayer defendants claim conditional title conveyed to county by dedication, 1805 — For use for courthouse only — Plaintiffs claim title conveyed to county commissioners by deed, 1813 — With no reversion of forfeiture — Taxpayer defendants claim that 1813 deed an affirmation of dedication — That county commissioners had no authority to establish seat of justice — That such power exercised by General Assembly — And that General Assembly Commissioners notified of owner's intent — To donate property to county for courthouse use — Decrees for plaintiffs by Common Pleas Court and Court of Appeals.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery county.

Mr. Mathias H. Heck, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Albert J. Dwyer, for appellee.

Mr. Eugene G. Kennedy, Mr. Miles S. Kuhns, Mr. Heber S. Leonard, Mr. Otterbein Creager, Mr. Howard P. Williamson, Mr. Roy G. Fitzgerald and Mr. William M. Pettit, for appellants.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

B.C.C.M.C.A. v. U.H.D. L.R.C.A

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 22, 1949
88 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 1949)
Case details for

B.C.C.M.C.A. v. U.H.D. L.R.C.A

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, APPELLEE v. UNKNOWN…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 22, 1949

Citations

88 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 1949)
88 N.E.2d 293

Citing Cases

State v. Nowak, Jr

"Except as statute may provide otherwise, no formal charge or hearing is necessary before the court may…

State v. Murphy

"It is the policy of this court upon such applications for leave to appeal to exercise discretion in the…