From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BBCN Bank v. 12th Ave. Rest. Grp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2016
144 A.D.3d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-15-2016

BBCN BANK formerly known as Nara Bank, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 12TH AVENUE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., doing business as Hudson River Café, et al., Defendants–Respondents, Hamlet Peralta, et al., Defendants.

Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein LLP, Lake Success (Andrew C. Lang of counsel), for appellant. Robert A. Siegel, New York, for respondents.


Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein LLP, Lake Success (Andrew C. Lang of counsel), for appellant.

Robert A. Siegel, New York, for respondents.

RENWICK, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, KAHN, GESMER, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered November 5, 2015, which granted defendants 12th Avenue Restaurant Group, Inc., d/b/a Hudson River Café, and Rafael Cepeda's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

To vacate the default judgment, defendants were required to show a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see John Harris P.C. v. Krauss, 87 A.D.3d 469, 928 N.Y.S.2d 295 [1st Dept.2011] ). The court abused its discretion in finding that defendants made these showings. With regard to reasonable excuse, defendants relied on law office failure. However, they failed to show that they even retained counsel for this, as opposed to another action. Further, while counsel passed away some two years into the case (or to take defendants' view, six months after he was retained) from a “long illness,” defendants offered no evidence at all as to when counsel took ill or how and when that illness affected his ability to put in an answer. This speculation is insufficient to establish law office failure (see Herbstein v. Herbstein, 44 A.D.3d 311, 843 N.Y.S.2d 560 [1st Dept.2007] ).

Defendants failed to establish a meritorious defense. Their claim that Cepeda never knew of the debt to plaintiff is belied by the asset purchase agreement which Cepeda signed and in which 12th Avenue acquired all of HRC's assets, and pursuant to which one half of the purchase price ($225,000) was to be conveyed by the assumption by 12th Avenue of the debt owed to plaintiff.


Summaries of

BBCN Bank v. 12th Ave. Rest. Grp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2016
144 A.D.3d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

BBCN Bank v. 12th Ave. Rest. Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BBCN BANK formerly known as Nara Bank, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 12TH AVENUE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
41 N.Y.S.3d 226
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7593

Citing Cases

Ruderman v. N.Y. State Ins. Fund

No affidavit based on personal knowledge from anyone at Imbesi Law or even any hearsay evidence of…

Einbinder v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.

III. CONCLUSIONFor all these reasons, Titan Global fails to demonstrate unusual or unanticipated…