From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bazik v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
CASE NO. CV 09-6118-MMM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 09-6118-MMM (PJW)

08-31-2011

VALOD BAZIK, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR. Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

MARGARET M. MORROW

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bazik v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
CASE NO. CV 09-6118-MMM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Bazik v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:VALOD BAZIK, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR. Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 09-6118-MMM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)