From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dept. of Envtl. Protec

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 7, 1974
131 N.J. Super. 37 (App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

Argued October 22, 1974 —

Decided November 7, 1974.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, LYNCH and ALLCORN.

Mr. William R. Holzapfel argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Francis R. Perkins, on the brief).

Mr. Morton J. Goldfein, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents Department of Environmental Protection of the State of New Jersey and State of New Jersey ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., former Attorney General of New Jersey; Mr. Joseph M. Clayton, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. John E. Holobinko argued the cause for respondents Township of Hazlet and Hazlet Township Sewerage Authority ( Messrs. Roberts, Madden Holobinko, attorneys).

Mr. Clark C. Vogel argued the cause for respondent Bayshore Regional Sewerage Authority ( Messrs. Stout, O'Hagan Hertz, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge McGowan which is reported at 122 N.J. Super. 184 (Ch.Div. 1973).


Summaries of

Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dept. of Envtl. Protec

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 7, 1974
131 N.J. Super. 37 (App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dept. of Envtl. Protec

Case Details

Full title:BAYSHORE SEWERAGE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Nov 7, 1974

Citations

131 N.J. Super. 37 (App. Div. 1974)
328 A.2d 246

Citing Cases

Woodsum v. Township of Pemberton

See, also, Independence Savings Bank v. 290 Madison Corp., 167 N.J. Super. 473 (App.Div. 1979). Bayshore…

Witt v. Borough of Maywood

When two actions are open to a municipal body, municipal action is not arbitrary and capricious if exercised…