From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baysden v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-23-2016

In the Matter of Edward BAYSDEN, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Edward Baysden, Gowanda, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent.


Edward Baysden, Gowanda, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, ROSE, LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

During a search of petitioner's prison cell, a correction officer found a folded can lid with a cloth handle located inside of petitioner's instrument case. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The penalty imposed was modified by correction officials and the determination was later affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, unusual incident report, photograph of the weapon and testimony of the correction officer who conducted the search provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Burgos v. Prack, 129 A.D.3d 1434, 1434, 10 N.Y.S.3d 763 [2015] ; Matter of Diaz v. Prack, 127 A.D.3d 1489, 1490, 6 N.Y.S.3d 327 [2015] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the hearing testimony does not establish that he was set up and, in any event, such claim presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Gonzalez v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 995 N.Y.S.2d 859 [2014] ). Petitioner's assertion that the search of his cell was not carried out in compliance with Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Directive No. 4910 is unpreserved.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Baysden v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Baysden v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Edward BAYSDEN, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 1519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
140 A.D.3d 1519
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5015

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior report, unusual incident report and supporting documentation, as well as the…

Mason v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior report, unusual incident report, pictures of the weapons and testimony at the…