From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayork Realty Corporation v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

October, 1935.


Order of the County Court of Suffolk county denying motion to strike out a portion of the amended answer of the Superintendent of Insurance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice may not be invoked to challenge the sufficiency of this defense. ( Stern v. Philipsborn, 169 App. Div. 781.) Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 544.]


Summaries of

Bayork Realty Corporation v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Bayork Realty Corporation v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:BAYORK REALTY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FLORENCE HUNT and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)