From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baylor v. Petrano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00259-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00259-MP-GRJ

03-14-2013

DARLENE P. BAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DAVID FRANK PETRANO and MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO, Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 22, 2013. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Eighth Judicial Circuit in and for Alachua County, Florida, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
3. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of Court for the Eighth Judicial Circuit in and for Alachua County, Florida, close the file, and terminate all pending motions

_______________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Baylor v. Petrano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00259-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Baylor v. Petrano

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE P. BAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DAVID FRANK PETRANO and MARY KATHERINE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00259-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 14, 2013)