From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayless v. Bd. of Trs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 24, 2022
2:22-cv-00335-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00335-JAD-NJK

08-24-2022

KERMIT S. BAYLESS Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 13]

Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss. Docket No. 13; see also Docket No. 10 (motion to dismiss). Plaintiff has not filed a response. Having evaluated the applicable standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013); LR 7-2(d) (a party's failure to respond to a motion constitutes consent), the Court finds that a stay of discovery is proper in this case. Accordingly,) the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. Docket No. 13. In the event resolution of the motion to dismiss does not result in the termination of this matter, the parties must submit a joint proposed discovery plan or joint status report within 14 days of the issuance of the order resolving the motion) to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bayless v. Bd. of Trs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 24, 2022
2:22-cv-00335-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Bayless v. Bd. of Trs.

Case Details

Full title:KERMIT S. BAYLESS Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00335-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)