From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayer v. Oxford University Press

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1947
296 N.Y. 780 (N.Y. 1947)

Summary

stating that employee had no rights in a bonus where he was not in the defendants' employ on the required date

Summary of this case from Welland v. Citicorp, Inc

Opinion

Argued November 25, 1946

Decided January 9, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, HOFSTADTER, J.

John Logan O'Donnell for appellant.

Thomas O'Rourke Gallagher for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Bayer v. Oxford University Press

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1947
296 N.Y. 780 (N.Y. 1947)

stating that employee had no rights in a bonus where he was not in the defendants' employ on the required date

Summary of this case from Welland v. Citicorp, Inc
Case details for

Bayer v. Oxford University Press

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK F. BAYER, Respondent, v. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 9, 1947

Citations

296 N.Y. 780 (N.Y. 1947)
71 N.E.2d 215

Citing Cases

Zolotar v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.

Recently, in Weiner v. Diebold Group ( 173 A.D.2d 166, 167), we stated "[t]he rule with respect to the…

Welland v. Citicorp, Inc

Similarly, where the relevant bonus policy requires employment through a certain date and the employee was…