From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayani v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 22, 2023
2:23-cv-00271-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00271-JHC

06-22-2023

EMAN BAYANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant.

TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 Adrienne D. McEntee, WSBA #34061 Joseph A. Fitapelli, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Frank J. Mazzaferro, Admitted Pro Hac Vice FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Stephen M. Rummage, WSBA #11168 Jennifer K. Chung, WSBA #51583 Daniel H. Leigh, Admitted Pro Hac Vice James Moon, Admitted Pro Hac Vice DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorneys for Defendant


TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 Adrienne D. McEntee, WSBA #34061 Joseph A. Fitapelli, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Frank J. Mazzaferro, Admitted Pro Hac Vice FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Stephen M. Rummage, WSBA #11168 Jennifer K. Chung, WSBA #51583 Daniel H. Leigh, Admitted Pro Hac Vice James Moon, Admitted Pro Hac Vice DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. STIPULATION

The parties, by and through counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 27, 2023, Plaintiff Eman Bayani (“Bayani”) commenced a putative class action in this Court. (ECF No. 1.)

2. On March 14, 2023, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court entered an Order that Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) shall have up to and including Monday, April 24, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Bayani's Complaint. (ECF No. 6.)

3. On March 17, 2023, the Court entered an Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. (ECF No. 11.)

4. On March 29, 2023, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court entered an order continuing the case deadlines. (ECF No. 17.)

5. On April 24, 2023, T-Mobile filed a Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 19.)

6. On May 10, 2023, the parties stipulated to extend the initial case deadlines to allow time for the Court to rule on the motion to dismiss before commencing discovery. (ECF No. 22.)

7. On May 10, 2023, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court entered an order continuing the case deadlines. (ECF No. 23.)

8. The motion to dismiss is fully briefed and currently awaiting a ruling.

9. Subject to the Court's approval, the parties have agreed to ask the Court to defer initial case deadlines while the motion to dismiss is pending. The parties ask that the Court either strike the case deadlines pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss and reset them (if necessary) after issuing a ruling, or adjust the case schedule as follows:

EVENT

CURRENT DEADLINE

PROPOSED DEADLINE

Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference

06/29/2023

07/28/2023

Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)

07/14/2023

08/11/2023

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f)

07/20/2023

08/18/2023

STIPULATED TO AND DATED this 22nd day of June, 2023.

II. ORDER

Based on the parties stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bayani v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 22, 2023
2:23-cv-00271-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Bayani v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EMAN BAYANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 22, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00271-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)