From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bay Park Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Jan 20, 2012
Case No. 11-20944 CIV MORENO/BROWN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-20944 CIV MORENO/BROWN

01-20-2012

BAY PARK TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE

RE; "MATCHING"

This matter is before this Court on Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony and Evidence Regarding "Matching" ...(DE. 39). The Court has considered the motion, the response, the reply, and all pertinent materials in the file.

The Court finds the cases of Ocean View Towers Association. Inc. v. QBE Insurance Corp. 2012 WL 8569 (S.D. Fla. 2011) and Strasser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. 2010 WL 667945 (S.D. Fla. 2010) quite persuasive - notwithstanding plaintiff's "tortured" attempt to make the Strasser case say something it doesn't. Both cases, soundly and with excellent reasoning, reject the position of plaintiff herein, and plaintiff has really cited nothing in support of same.

Plaintiff opposes this motion with the novel - though totally unsupported - theory that if QBE does not elect to make a payment, "then said provisions do not apply and therefore, cannot be used to restrict the coverage which the Policy does not provide" (Resp. p. 2). Apparently plaintiff would have a new and novel theory - in insurance cases, if it is determined that the insurer breaches a condition of the policy, all provisions, limitations, and other conditions no longer exist. Damages may be recovered if incurred - whether they would have been covered by the policy or not!

Plaintiff then "stretches" the holding in Strasser (which is not a holding but, at best, dicta) and points out that "this identical language 'requires that Defendant match' when it opts to make the repairs itself (Resp. p. 2). While the statement is accurate, the holding in that case is that it's defendant's choice and unless and until defendant chooses to utilize that method of addressing damages in this case, evidence and testimony regarding same are completely irrelevant and immaterial and further might unduly prejudice the jury.

Therefore, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that said motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2012, at Miami, Florida.

_______________

STEPHER T. BROWN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: Honorable Federico A. Moreno

counsel of record


Summaries of

Bay Park Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Jan 20, 2012
Case No. 11-20944 CIV MORENO/BROWN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Bay Park Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BAY PARK TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. QBE INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-20944 CIV MORENO/BROWN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2012)