From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. U.S.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
21-cv-03775-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-03775-HSG

07-01-2021

ANTHONY HARRISON BAXTER, Petitioner, v. U.S., Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about May 19, 2021, Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 1. That same day, the Clerk of the Court informed Petitioner that this action was deficient because he had not submitted an in forma pauperis application or paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 2. The Court provided Petitioner with a blank in forma pauperis application and a postage-paid return envelope. Dkt. No. 2. Petitioner was instructed to respond within twenty-eight days of the date of the order. Id. The deadline has passed, and Petitioner has not submitted the required documents. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Petitioner may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must contain either the full filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Baxter v. U.S.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
21-cv-03775-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Baxter v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HARRISON BAXTER, Petitioner, v. U.S., Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

21-cv-03775-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)