From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97688.

2012-11-20

Jason BAXTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 09SL–CC4161, David L. Vincent III, Judge. Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Jennifer A. Wideman, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 09SL–CC4161, David L. Vincent III, Judge.


Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Jennifer A. Wideman, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, S.J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jason Baxter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baxter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Baxter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jason BAXTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

386 S.W.3d 202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)