From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. Spring Valley Hosp. & Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 4, 2013
2:11-cv-01293-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

2:11-cv-01293-GMN-NJK

03-04-2013

PAMELA BAXTER, Plaintiff, v. SPRING VALLEY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion Invoking Protection of Rights (#70) and Plaintiff's Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#71). The Court has considered the Plaintiff's Motions (#70) and (#71) and the Defendants' Response (#73).

DISCUSSION

On November 21, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Invoke Protection of Rights and for Appointment of Counsel (#60). The Court denied that Motion (#60) because the Plaintiff "failed to show any circumstances compelling the appointment of counsel." Order (#65). The present Motions (#70) and (#71) are virtually identical to Motion (#60). The Plaintiff has failed to show any circumstances compelling the appointment of counsel. ... ... ...

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion Invoking Protection of Rights (#70) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#71) is DENIED.

_______________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Baxter v. Spring Valley Hosp. & Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 4, 2013
2:11-cv-01293-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Baxter v. Spring Valley Hosp. & Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA BAXTER, Plaintiff, v. SPRING VALLEY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-01293-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)