From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. Dir., Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2012
473 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6213

05-30-2012

LEON L. BAXTER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.

Leon L. Baxter, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01259-AJT-IDD)

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon L. Baxter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Leon L. Baxter seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baxter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Baxter v. Dir., Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2012
473 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Baxter v. Dir., Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:LEON L. BAXTER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

473 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2012)