Opinion
March, 1907.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented on the ground that plaintiff's intestate was not shown to have been free from contributory negligence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Baxter v. Auburn Syracuse Electric Railroad Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1907
118 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Summaries of
Baxter v. Auburn Syracuse Electric Railroad Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1907
118 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for
Baxter v. Auburn Syracuse Electric Railroad Co.
Case Details
Full title:Angeline Baxter, as Administratrix, etc., of Charles E. Baxter, Deceased…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1907
Citations
118 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)