From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxley v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 13, 2013
NO. 09-13-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00340-CR

11-13-2013

AUSTYN LEIGH BAXLEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-06-06666 CR


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Austyn Leigh Baxley filed a notice of appeal but he did not make payment arrangements for the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). The appellant has been represented by retained counsel and he did not file an affidavit of indigence. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. On September 17, 2013, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. No response has been filed. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk's record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Baxley v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 13, 2013
NO. 09-13-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Baxley v. State

Case Details

Full title:AUSTYN LEIGH BAXLEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

NO. 09-13-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2013)